Loading…
WOLFcon 2018 has ended
Thursday, May 10 • 10:30am - 12:30pm
Single tenant consortia implementation (Cross-SIG, Consortium)

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule and see who's attending!

"- What would it mean to implement a consortium within a single tenant?
- What would be the pros and cons of implementing a consortium as a single tenant vs multi-tenant?
- Do we want to prioritize the work needed to support single-tenant consortia? May depend on discussion below.
- What would need to change to make that possible? Would we need to scope/put limiters on:
-- Users
-- Permissions (e.g. should people only be able to edit calendars associated with a given service point or location?)
-- Settings scoping (notifications, print slips, controlled vocabs etc - go through Settings and discuss all)
-- Inventory/catalog scoping
-- Funds
-- Payments
-- Consortial borrowing (may need a separate meeting for this)
-- Etc.
- What else would need to be considered? Review roadmap (consortia tab)
"- What would it mean to implement a consortium within a single tenant?
- What would be the pros and cons of implementing a consortium as a single tenant vs multi-tenant?
- Do we want to prioritize the work needed to support single-tenant consortia? May depend on discussion below.
- What would need to change to make that possible? Would we need to scope/put limiters on:
-- Users
-- Permissions (e.g. should people only be able to edit calendars associated with a given service point or location?)
-- Settings scoping (notifications, print slips, controlled vocabs etc - go through Settings and discuss all)
-- Inventory/catalog scoping
-- Funds
-- Payments
-- Consortial borrowing (may need a separate meeting for this)
-- Etc.
- What else would need to be considered? Review roadmap (consortia tab)
""- What would it mean to implement a consortium within a single tenant?
- What would be the pros and cons of implementing a consortium as a single tenant vs multi-tenant?
- Do we want to prioritize the work needed to support single-tenant consortia? May depend on discussion below.
- What would need to change to make that possible? Would we need to scope/put limiters on:
-- Users
-- Permissions (e.g. should people only be able to edit calendars associated with a given service point or location?)
-- Settings scoping (notifications, print slips, controlled vocabs etc - go through Settings and discuss all)
-- Inventory/catalog scoping
-- Funds
-- Payments
-- Consortial borrowing (may need a separate meeting for this)
-- Etc.
- What else would need to be considered? Review roadmap (consortia tab)
"- What would it mean to implement a consortium within a single tenant?
- What would be the pros and cons of implementing a consortium as a single tenant vs multi-tenant?
- Do we want to prioritize the work needed to support single-tenant consortia? May depend on discussion below.
- What would need to change to make that possible? Would we need to scope/put limiters on:
-- Users
-- Permissions (e.g. should people only be able to edit calendars associated with a given service point or location?)
-- Settings scoping (notifications, print slips, controlled vocabs etc - go through Settings and discuss all)
-- Inventory/catalog scoping
-- Funds
-- Payments
-- Consortial borrowing (may need a separate meeting for this)
-- Etc.
- What else would need to be considered? Review roadmap (consortia tab)
"- What would it mean to implement a consortium within a single tenant?
- What would be the pros and cons of implementing a consortium as a single tenant vs multi-tenant?
- Do we want to prioritize the work needed to support single-tenant consortia? May depend on discussion below.
- What would need to change to make that possible? Would we need to scope/put limiters on:
-- Users
-- Permissions (e.g. should people only be able to edit calendars associated with a given service point or location?)
-- Settings scoping (notifications, print slips, controlled vocabs etc - go through Settings and discuss all)
-- Inventory/catalog scoping
-- Funds
-- Payments
-- Consortial borrowing (may need a separate meeting for this)
-- Etc.
- What else would need to be considered? Review roadmap (consortia tab)
"

Moderators
Thursday May 10, 2018 10:30am - 12:30pm
21c Museum Hotel

Attendees (5)